SHRI MAHAVIR J. H. KASTLA KAMRA NO 3 PS 25

AC 58 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR

BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY

423 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

328 50.7 pp

votes

over ARVIND SHARMA (INCP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,049

Total turnout648votes cast at this station

Turnout %61.8% of this booth's roll

Male electors373

Female electors275

Vote share in this booth

of 647 votes counted

BJP 65.4% INCP 14.7% BSP 10.2% SP 8.3% IND 0.5% AAP 0.3% JAP 0.2% AIMEI 0.2% IND 0.2% IND 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR	BJP	423	65.38%
2	ARVIND SHARMA	INCP	95	14.68%
3	BASID	BSP	66	10.20%
4	AAASLAM ALI	SP	54	8.35%
5	KULDEEP	IND	3	0.46%
6	C.M. CHAUHAN	AAP	2	0.31%
7	NAZIM	JAP	1	0.15%
8	ARIF	AIMEI	1	0.15%
9	PRAMOD KUMAR	IND	1	0.15%
10	KEERTY PRATAP SINGH	IND	1	0.15%
11	BRIJESH KORI	SJP	0	0.00%
12	ASAMA	IND	0	0.00%
13	TRIVEDI	NCP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 647 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 58

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	423	65.28%	1	130	Strong
INCP	95	14.66%	2	2	Weak
BSP	66	10.19%	3	152	Weak
SP	54	8.33%	4	331	Poor
IND	5	0.77%	5	114	Poor
AAP	2	0.31%	6	89	Poor
AIMEI	1	0.15%	7	237	Poor
JAP	1	0.15%	8	17	Poor
NCP	0	0.00%	9	146	Poor
SJP	0	0.00%	10	146	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 58, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.