COMPOSITE VIDYALAYA AKBARPUR BEHRAMPUR ROOM NO 1 PS 1
Atul Garg
BJPBharatiya Janata Party356 votes at this polling station
over Pintu Singh (IND)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atul Garg | BJP | 356 | 65.44% | |
| 2 | Pintu Singh | IND | 61 | 11.21% | |
| 3 | Vishal Verma | SP | 59 | 10.85% | |
| 4 | Krishan Kumar | BSP | 57 | 10.48% | |
| 5 | nota | NOTA | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 6 | Rani Dev Shree | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 7 | SUSHANT GOYAL | INC | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 8 | Naresh Kumar | RSP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | Nimit | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | Pradeep Kumar Pathak | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAKESH SURI | RRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Amit Sharma | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Ashutosh Gupta | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Sudhir Kumar | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | Rajnish Kumar Thakur | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 544 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 356 | 65.44% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| IND | 63 | 11.58% | 2 | 1 | Weak |
| SP | 59 | 10.85% | 3 | 1 | Weak |
| BSP | 57 | 10.48% | 4 | 1 | Weak |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.74% | 5 | 1 | Poor |
| RSP | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 1 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.37% | 6 | 1 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 1 | Poor |
| RRP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 1 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 1 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 56, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.