PRIMARY PATHSHALA N0 1 K0N0 3 HISAWDA PS 155
Mohd Ahmed Hameed
RLDRLD286 votes at this polling station
over Yogesh Dhama (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mohd Ahmed Hameed | RLD | 286 | 57.55% | |
| 2 | Yogesh Dhama | BJP | 205 | 41.25% | |
| 3 | Vinay Kasana | IND | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 4 | Arun Kasana | BSP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 5 | Naveen Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 6 | Pramod Kumar Goswami | SIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | Rasid | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Vinod Kumar | INAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Maharaj Singh | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Renu | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Anil | INC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 497 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 286 | 57.55% | 1 | 142 | Strong |
| BJP | 205 | 41.25% | 2 | 238 | Strong |
| IND | 3 | 0.60% | 3 | 206 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.40% | 4 | 276 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 5 | 230 | Poor |
| INAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 230 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 326 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 222 | Poor |
| SIP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 224 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 52, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.