PRATHMIK VIDHALAYA LISARI ROOM NO.2 PS 142
Candidate Name 1 MOHD. AADIL
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY443 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 2 DILSHAD ALI (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 1 MOHD. AADIL | SP | 443 | 58.06% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 2 DILSHAD ALI | BSP | 181 | 23.72% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 4 DR. SOMENDRA TOMAR | BJP | 121 | 15.86% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 6 OMDUTT | AAP | 7 | 0.92% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 3 NAFIS | INC | 6 | 0.79% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 9 MUKESH | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 7 RAJUDDIN GADRE | BMP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 8 SHAKEEL AHMAD | NBEP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 5 AFJAL | SAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name 10 SANDEEP CHAUDHARY | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name 11 HARISH CHANDRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 763 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 443 | 57.91% | 1 | 118 | Strong |
| BSP | 181 | 23.66% | 2 | 81 | Weak |
| BJP | 121 | 15.82% | 3 | 335 | Weak |
| AAP | 7 | 0.92% | 4 | 11 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.78% | 5 | 139 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.26% | 6 | 189 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.13% | 7 | 120 | Poor |
| NBEP | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 179 | Poor |
| SAP | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 167 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 49, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.