PRATHMIK VIDHALAYAAAURANGSHAHPUR DIGGI ROOM NO.3 PS 326
RAFIQ ANSARI
SPSamajwadi Party183 votes at this polling station
over DILSHAD (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAFIQ ANSARI | SP | 183 | 40.31% | |
| 2 | DILSHAD | BSP | 176 | 38.77% | |
| 3 | KAMAL DUTT SHARMA | BJP | 75 | 16.52% | |
| 4 | RANJAN SHARMA | INC | 5 | 1.10% | |
| 5 | ANKIT SHARMA | IND | 5 | 1.10% | |
| 6 | Nota | NOTA | 5 | 1.10% | |
| 7 | IMRAN AHMAD | AIMEI | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 8 | KAPIL KUMAR SHARMA | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | ALI SHER | ASPKR | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | SUSHIL VERMA | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ASHOK | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KANAK JAIN | MS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AFZAL | SAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 454 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 183 | 40.31% | 1 | 197 | Strong |
| BSP | 176 | 38.77% | 2 | 7 | Average |
| BJP | 75 | 16.52% | 3 | 189 | Weak |
| IND | 5 | 1.10% | 4 | 7 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.10% | 5 | 268 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 1.10% | 6 | 27 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.66% | 7 | 170 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 80 | Poor |
| SAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 333 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 330 | Poor |
| MS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 331 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 48, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.