UCHH PRATHMIK VIDHALAYA(1 TO 8 ) SARAY BEHLEEM ROOM 2 PS 199
RAFIQ ANSARI
SPSamajwadi Party597 votes at this polling station
over IMRAN AHMAD (AIMEI)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAFIQ ANSARI | SP | 597 | 93.28% | |
| 2 | IMRAN AHMAD | AIMEI | 13 | 2.03% | |
| 3 | RANJAN SHARMA | INC | 11 | 1.72% | |
| 4 | KAMAL DUTT SHARMA | BJP | 11 | 1.72% | |
| 5 | DILSHAD | BSP | 6 | 0.94% | |
| 6 | ANKIT SHARMA | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | ALI SHER | ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | Nota | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | AFZAL | SAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | KANAK JAIN | MS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KAPIL KUMAR SHARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL VERMA | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ASHOK | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 640 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 597 | 93.28% | 1 | 60 | Strong |
| AIMEI | 13 | 2.03% | 2 | 86 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 1.72% | 4 | 151 | Poor |
| BJP | 11 | 1.72% | 3 | 239 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 0.94% | 5 | 104 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | 6 | 57 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 126 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 251 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 228 | Poor |
| MS | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 214 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 311 | Poor |
| SAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 231 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 48, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.