B.A.V.INTER COLLEGE ROOM NO. 1 SUBHASH BAZAR PS 179
KAMAL DUTT SHARMA
BJPBharatiya Janata Party358 votes at this polling station
over RAFIQ ANSARI (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMAL DUTT SHARMA | BJP | 358 | 63.81% | |
| 2 | RAFIQ ANSARI | SP | 192 | 34.22% | |
| 3 | RANJAN SHARMA | INC | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 4 | IMRAN AHMAD | AIMEI | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 5 | Nota | NOTA | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 6 | ANKIT SHARMA | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 7 | AFZAL | SAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | ALI SHER | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | KANAK JAIN | MS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | KAPIL KUMAR SHARMA | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SUSHIL VERMA | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ASHOK | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | DILSHAD | BSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 561 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 358 | 63.81% | 1 | 121 | Strong |
| SP | 192 | 34.22% | 2 | 195 | Average |
| INC | 5 | 0.89% | 3 | 259 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.53% | 4 | 165 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.36% | 5 | 122 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.18% | 6 | 120 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 209 | Poor |
| MS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 194 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 322 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 237 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 221 | Poor |
| SAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 215 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 48, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.