PRATHMIK VIDYALYA ROOM NO-2 ULDHAN PS 370
Shahid Manzoor
SPSamajwadi Party444 votes at this polling station
over Satyavir Tyagi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 444 | 92.12% | |
| 2 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 14 | 2.90% | |
| 3 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 7 | 1.45% | |
| 4 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 7 | 1.45% | |
| 5 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 6 | 1.24% | |
| 6 | Daud | IND | 4 | 0.83% | |
| 7 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 482 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 444 | 91.93% | 1 | 89 | Strong |
| BJP | 14 | 2.90% | 2 | 389 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.45% | 4 | 46 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 7 | 1.45% | 3 | 140 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 1.24% | 5 | 281 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.83% | 6 | 137 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 380 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 402 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 382 | Poor |
| NBEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 386 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 376 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.