PRATHMIK VIDYALYA KHANPUR PS 359
Satyavir Tyagi
BJPBharatiya Janata party416 votes at this polling station
over Shahid Manzoor (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 416 | 79.69% | |
| 2 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 80 | 15.33% | |
| 3 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 12 | 2.30% | |
| 4 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 5 | 0.96% | |
| 5 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 4 | 0.77% | |
| 6 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 7 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Daud | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 522 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 416 | 79.54% | 1 | 80 | Strong |
| SP | 80 | 15.30% | 2 | 322 | Weak |
| INC | 12 | 2.29% | 3 | 11 | Poor |
| BSP | 5 | 0.96% | 4 | 293 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.76% | 5 | 136 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.38% | 6 | 168 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 251 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 132 | Poor |
| BJD | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 84 | Poor |
| NBEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 382 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 371 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.