PRATHMIK VIDYALYA GOVINDPUR PS 339
Shahid Manzoor
SPSamajwadi Party708 votes at this polling station
over Satyavir Tyagi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 708 | 89.62% | |
| 2 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 44 | 5.57% | |
| 3 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 18 | 2.28% | |
| 4 | Daud | IND | 7 | 0.89% | |
| 5 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 5 | 0.63% | |
| 6 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 3 | 0.38% | |
| 7 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 2 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 9 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 790 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 708 | 89.51% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| BJP | 44 | 5.56% | 2 | 354 | Poor |
| BSP | 18 | 2.28% | 3 | 227 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.01% | 4 | 24 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 5 | 0.63% | 5 | 158 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.38% | 6 | 191 | Poor |
| BJD | 2 | 0.25% | 7 | 16 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 111 | Poor |
| NBEP | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 199 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 394 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 359 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.