PRATHMIK VIDYALYA ROOM NO- 3 AAD PS 326
Shahid Manzoor
SPSamajwadi Party584 votes at this polling station
over Satyavir Tyagi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 584 | 95.89% | |
| 2 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 7 | 1.15% | |
| 3 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 7 | 1.15% | |
| 4 | Daud | IND | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 5 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 6 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 609 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 584 | 95.42% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| BJP | 7 | 1.14% | 3 | 402 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 7 | 1.14% | 2 | 139 | Poor |
| IND | 7 | 1.14% | 4 | 43 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.33% | 5 | 350 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | 6 | 269 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 350 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 350 | Poor |
| NBEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 364 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 353 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 343 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.