UCCH PRATHMIK VIDYALYA (1 TO 8) ROOM NO-2 BHATIPURA MANAKPUR PS 32
Satyavir Tyagi
BJPBharatiya Janata party319 votes at this polling station
over Shahid Manzoor (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 319 | 56.26% | |
| 2 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 132 | 23.28% | |
| 3 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 101 | 17.81% | |
| 4 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 6 | 1.06% | |
| 5 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 6 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 7 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 8 | Daud | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 567 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 319 | 55.87% | 1 | 152 | Strong |
| SP | 132 | 23.12% | 2 | 260 | Weak |
| BSP | 101 | 17.69% | 3 | 117 | Weak |
| AAP | 6 | 1.05% | 4 | 5 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.53% | 5 | 154 | Poor |
| NBEP | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 66 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.35% | 6 | 113 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 209 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 294 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 163 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 111 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.