PRATHMIK VIDYALYA NO 2 ROOM NO -1 MUNDALI PS 315
Satyavir Tyagi
BJPBharatiya Janata party682 votes at this polling station
over Shahid Manzoor (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 682 | 81.19% | |
| 2 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 133 | 15.83% | |
| 3 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 4 | 0.48% | |
| 4 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 4 | 0.48% | |
| 5 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 6 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 7 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 8 | Daud | IND | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 2 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 11 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 12 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 13 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 840 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 682 | 81.00% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| SP | 133 | 15.80% | 2 | 258 | Weak |
| IND | 9 | 1.07% | 3 | 13 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.48% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.36% | 5 | 96 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.36% | 6 | 174 | Poor |
| BSP | 3 | 0.36% | 7 | 322 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.12% | 9 | 345 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 1 | 0.12% | 10 | 118 | Poor |
| BJD | 1 | 0.12% | 8 | 77 | Poor |
| NBEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.