PT. RAM SWAROOP DURGA HIGHER SEC.SCHOOL ROOM NO-10 SISOLI PS 287
Satyavir Tyagi
BJPBharatiya Janata party317 votes at this polling station
over Shahid Manzoor (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 317 | 59.03% | |
| 2 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 122 | 22.72% | |
| 3 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 95 | 17.69% | |
| 4 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 5 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 6 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 7 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Daud | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 537 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 317 | 58.81% | 1 | 156 | Strong |
| SP | 122 | 22.63% | 2 | 275 | Weak |
| BSP | 95 | 17.63% | 3 | 123 | Weak |
| NBEP | 1 | 0.19% | 6 | 186 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.19% | 4 | 347 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.19% | 5 | 337 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 331 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 310 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 325 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 375 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.