PANCHAYAT GHAR INCHAULI PS 162
Shahid Manzoor
SPSamajwadi Party488 votes at this polling station
over Satyavir Tyagi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 488 | 76.01% | |
| 2 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 113 | 17.60% | |
| 3 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 14 | 2.18% | |
| 4 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 5 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 6 | Daud | IND | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 7 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 8 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 642 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 488 | 75.54% | 1 | 72 | Strong |
| BJP | 113 | 17.49% | 2 | 289 | Weak |
| ASPKR | 14 | 2.17% | 3 | 8 | Poor |
| IND | 8 | 1.24% | 4 | 18 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.93% | 6 | 51 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 6 | 0.93% | 5 | 144 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.62% | 7 | 305 | Poor |
| BJD | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 49 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 75 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 66 | Poor |
| NBEP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 291 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.