UCCH PRATHMIK VIDYALYA DISTRICT COUNCIL INCHAULI ROOM N0-3 PS 158
Shahid Manzoor
SPSamajwadi Party240 votes at this polling station
over Kushal Pal Mavi (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shahid Manzoor | SP | 240 | 43.32% | |
| 2 | Kushal Pal Mavi | BSP | 164 | 29.60% | |
| 3 | Satyavir Tyagi | BJP | 139 | 25.09% | |
| 4 | Chandra Vishal Tyagi | IND | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 5 | Babita Gurjar | INC | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 6 | Mohd. Zaid | NBEP | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 7 | Daud | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | Pawan Sharma | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Tasleem Ahmad | AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Rajesh Giri | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Rahul Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Sanjeev Kumar | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Mohd Anas | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 554 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 240 | 43.17% | 1 | 172 | Strong |
| BSP | 164 | 29.50% | 2 | 70 | Average |
| BJP | 139 | 25.00% | 3 | 267 | Average |
| IND | 7 | 1.26% | 4 | 34 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.36% | 5 | 235 | Poor |
| NBEP | 2 | 0.36% | 6 | 85 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 244 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 209 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 241 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 339 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 304 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 46, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.