MAHILA CHIKITASALYA MAHALKA PS 254
Candidate Name 1 Atul Pradhan
SPS.P430 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 3 Sangeet Singh Som (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 1 Atul Pradhan | SP | 430 | 56.88% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 3 Sangeet Singh Som | BJP | 182 | 24.07% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 4 Sanjeev Dhama | BSP | 130 | 17.20% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 10 Devendra | INDEP | 4 | 0.53% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 2 Syed Rehanuddin | INC | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 5 Zeeshan Alam | AIMIM | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 6 Devendra | JAP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 7 Ramesh Chand | PSP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 11 Vinod Soam | INDEP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name 9 Daya Chand | INDEP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name 8 Sanjay | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 756 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 430 | 56.58% | 1 | 77 | Strong |
| BJP | 182 | 23.95% | 2 | 233 | Weak |
| BSP | 130 | 17.11% | 3 | 43 | Weak |
| INDEP | 6 | 0.79% | 4 | 33 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.39% | 5 | 146 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.26% | 6 | 145 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.26% | 7 | 16 | Poor |
| PSP | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 91 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 301 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 44, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.