PRATHMIK VIDHALYA JAFARABAD DURVESHPUR R.N0 -2 PS 76
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal260 votes at this polling station
over MANINDER PAL (BJ)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 260 | 60.61% | |
| 2 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 87 | 20.28% | |
| 3 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 68 | 15.85% | |
| 4 | NASIM | IND | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 5 | Nota | NOTA | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 6 | RAFAT | AIME | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | SUBHASH | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 429 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 260 | 60.61% | 1 | 155 | Strong |
| BJ | 87 | 20.28% | 2 | 311 | Weak |
| BS | 68 | 15.85% | 3 | 141 | Weak |
| IND | 4 | 0.93% | 4 | 71 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.70% | 5 | 104 | Poor |
| IJ | 2 | 0.47% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| AIME | 2 | 0.47% | 6 | 153 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 219 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 135 | Poor |
| IN | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 302 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 158 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 207 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.