PRATHMIK VIDHALYA JAFARABAD DURVESHPUR R.N0 -1 PS 75
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal546 votes at this polling station
over RAFAT (AIME)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 546 | 97.15% | |
| 2 | RAFAT | AIME | 6 | 1.07% | |
| 3 | Nota | NOTA | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 4 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 3 | 0.53% | |
| 5 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 6 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 7 | NASIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 562 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 546 | 97.15% | 1 | 36 | Strong |
| AIME | 6 | 1.07% | 2 | 93 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.89% | 3 | 44 | Poor |
| BJ | 3 | 0.53% | 4 | 387 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 5 | 134 | Poor |
| IN | 1 | 0.18% | 6 | 301 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 206 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 315 | Poor |
| BS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 387 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 157 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 334 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 186 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.