PRATHMIK VIDHALYA NO. 2 SARURPUR KHURD R. NO. 1 PS 60
MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN
BSBahujan Samaj Party388 votes at this polling station
over MANINDER PAL (BJ)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 388 | 51.66% | |
| 2 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 185 | 24.63% | |
| 3 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 168 | 22.37% | |
| 4 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 5 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 6 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 7 | RAFAT | AIME | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 8 | NASIM | IND | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 9 | Nota | NOTA | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 751 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | 388 | 51.66% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| BJ | 185 | 24.63% | 2 | 229 | Weak |
| RLD | 168 | 22.37% | 3 | 248 | Weak |
| IN | 3 | 0.40% | 5 | 151 | Poor |
| AJP | 3 | 0.40% | 4 | 121 | Poor |
| AIME | 1 | 0.13% | 7 | 206 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.13% | 6 | 132 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 244 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 239 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 178 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 146 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 197 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.