PANCHYAT GHAR PITHLOKAR PS 6
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal341 votes at this polling station
over MANINDER PAL (BJ)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 341 | 80.61% | |
| 2 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 47 | 11.11% | |
| 3 | RAFAT | AIME | 19 | 4.49% | |
| 4 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 10 | 2.36% | |
| 5 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 3 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 7 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | Nota | NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | NASIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 423 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 341 | 80.61% | 1 | 106 | Strong |
| BJ | 47 | 11.11% | 2 | 335 | Weak |
| AIME | 19 | 4.49% | 3 | 45 | Poor |
| BS | 10 | 2.36% | 4 | 267 | Poor |
| AJP | 3 | 0.71% | 5 | 117 | Poor |
| IJ | 1 | 0.24% | 6 | 33 | Poor |
| IN | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 283 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 221 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 102 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 318 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 232 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 162 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.