PRATHMIK VIDHALAYA CHANDORA PS 373
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal538 votes at this polling station
over RAFAT (AIME)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 538 | 73.20% | |
| 2 | RAFAT | AIME | 162 | 22.04% | |
| 3 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 13 | 1.77% | |
| 4 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 9 | 1.22% | |
| 5 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 6 | SUBHASH | IND | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 7 | Nota | NOTA | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | NASIM | IND | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | KULDEEP | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 735 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 538 | 73.20% | 1 | 39 | Strong |
| AIME | 162 | 22.04% | 2 | 2 | Weak |
| BJ | 13 | 1.77% | 3 | 370 | Poor |
| BS | 9 | 1.22% | 4 | 278 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.68% | 5 | 64 | Poor |
| IN | 4 | 0.54% | 6 | 140 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.27% | 7 | 216 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 284 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 152 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 385 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 380 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 376 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.