UCCH PRATHMIK VIDHALYA (1 TO 8) BAFAR ROOM N0 1 PS 369
MANINDER PAL
BJBharatiya Janata Party253 votes at this polling station
over GHULAM MOHAMMAD (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 253 | 40.74% | |
| 2 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 175 | 28.18% | |
| 3 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 164 | 26.41% | |
| 4 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 21 | 3.38% | |
| 5 | NASIM | IND | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 6 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 7 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 8 | SUBHASH | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Nota | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | RAFAT | AIME | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 621 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ | 253 | 40.74% | 1 | 174 | Strong |
| RLD | 175 | 28.18% | 2 | 241 | Average |
| BS | 164 | 26.41% | 3 | 68 | Average |
| AAP | 21 | 3.38% | 4 | 3 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.64% | 5 | 103 | Poor |
| BJD | 2 | 0.32% | 6 | 27 | Poor |
| IN | 2 | 0.32% | 7 | 276 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 386 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 376 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 382 | Poor |
| AIME | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 387 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 387 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.