UCCH PRATHMIK VIDHALYA (1 TO 8) PANCHALI BUJURG ROOM N0 1 PS 35
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal545 votes at this polling station
over MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN (BS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 545 | 82.58% | |
| 2 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 57 | 8.64% | |
| 3 | RAFAT | AIME | 20 | 3.03% | |
| 4 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 19 | 2.88% | |
| 5 | Nota | NOTA | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 6 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 4 | 0.61% | |
| 7 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 8 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | SUBHASH | IND | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | NASIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 660 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 545 | 82.58% | 1 | 37 | Strong |
| BS | 57 | 8.64% | 2 | 156 | Poor |
| AIME | 20 | 3.03% | 3 | 43 | Poor |
| BJ | 19 | 2.88% | 4 | 362 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.76% | 5 | 41 | Poor |
| AJP | 4 | 0.61% | 6 | 99 | Poor |
| IN | 3 | 0.45% | 7 | 147 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 64 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 155 | Poor |
| IJ | 2 | 0.30% | 10 | 10 | Poor |
| BJD | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 33 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 179 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.