PANCHYAT GHAR MULHERA R.N. 1 PS 27
MANINDER PAL
BJBharatiya Janata Party439 votes at this polling station
over AMIT JANI (AJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 439 | 91.08% | |
| 2 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 16 | 3.32% | |
| 3 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 13 | 2.70% | |
| 4 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 5 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 6 | KULDEEP | AAP | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | SUBHASH | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | Nota | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAFAT | AIME | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NASIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 482 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ | 439 | 91.08% | 1 | 40 | Strong |
| AJP | 16 | 3.32% | 2 | 19 | Poor |
| RLD | 13 | 2.70% | 3 | 387 | Poor |
| BS | 5 | 1.04% | 4 | 308 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.62% | 5 | 18 | Poor |
| IN | 3 | 0.62% | 6 | 146 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.21% | 7 | 124 | Poor |
| BJD | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 31 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 234 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 148 | Poor |
| AIME | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 290 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 323 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.