UCCH PRATHMIK VIDHALYA (1 TO 8) JANGETHI ROOM N0 4 PS 239
MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN
BSBahujan Samaj Party429 votes at this polling station
over GHULAM MOHAMMAD (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 429 | 79.30% | |
| 2 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 68 | 12.57% | |
| 3 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 32 | 5.91% | |
| 4 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 8 | 1.48% | |
| 5 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 6 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 7 | SUBHASH | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | Nota | NOTA | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAFAT | AIME | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NASIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 541 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | 429 | 79.30% | 1 | 3 | Strong |
| RLD | 68 | 12.57% | 2 | 336 | Weak |
| BJ | 32 | 5.91% | 3 | 354 | Poor |
| IN | 8 | 1.48% | 4 | 47 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 282 | Poor |
| BJD | 1 | 0.18% | 6 | 70 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 282 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.18% | 5 | 255 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 288 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 335 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 298 | Poor |
| AIME | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 352 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.