PRATHMIK VIDHALYA NO. 2 BHOLA PS 210
MANINDER PAL
BJBharatiya Janata Party515 votes at this polling station
over GHULAM MOHAMMAD (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 515 | 66.62% | |
| 2 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 206 | 26.65% | |
| 3 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 20 | 2.59% | |
| 4 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 14 | 1.81% | |
| 5 | RAFAT | AIME | 5 | 0.65% | |
| 6 | Nota | NOTA | 5 | 0.65% | |
| 7 | NASIM | IND | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 8 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 773 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ | 515 | 66.62% | 1 | 17 | Strong |
| RLD | 206 | 26.65% | 2 | 205 | Average |
| AJP | 20 | 2.59% | 3 | 16 | Poor |
| BS | 14 | 1.81% | 4 | 252 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.65% | 6 | 52 | Poor |
| AIME | 5 | 0.65% | 5 | 103 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.52% | 7 | 88 | Poor |
| IN | 3 | 0.39% | 8 | 176 | Poor |
| IJ | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 82 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 260 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 323 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 282 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.