PRATHMIK VIDHALYA NO. 1 RASULPUR ROHTA R. NO. 1 PS 202
MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN
BSBahujan Samaj Party327 votes at this polling station
over GHULAM MOHAMMAD (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 327 | 71.40% | |
| 2 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 71 | 15.50% | |
| 3 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 42 | 9.17% | |
| 4 | RAFAT | AIME | 6 | 1.31% | |
| 5 | NASIM | IND | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 6 | Nota | NOTA | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 7 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 8 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 458 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | 327 | 71.40% | 1 | 14 | Strong |
| RLD | 71 | 15.50% | 2 | 333 | Weak |
| BJ | 42 | 9.17% | 3 | 340 | Poor |
| AIME | 6 | 1.31% | 4 | 95 | Poor |
| AJP | 3 | 0.66% | 5 | 135 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.66% | 6 | 124 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.66% | 7 | 120 | Poor |
| IJ | 2 | 0.44% | 8 | 22 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 169 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 275 | Poor |
| IN | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 374 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 253 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.