KHAND VIKAS KARYALYA RASULPUR ROHTA R.NO. 3 PS 201
MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN
BSBahujan Samaj Party191 votes at this polling station
over GHULAM MOHAMMAD (RLD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 191 | 47.51% | |
| 2 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 139 | 34.58% | |
| 3 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 63 | 15.67% | |
| 4 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 6 | 1.49% | |
| 5 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 6 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 7 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | RAFAT | AIME | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | NASIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Nota | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 402 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BS | 191 | 47.51% | 1 | 56 | Strong |
| RLD | 139 | 34.58% | 2 | 273 | Average |
| BJ | 63 | 15.67% | 3 | 326 | Weak |
| AJP | 6 | 1.49% | 4 | 73 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 5 | 168 | Poor |
| IJ | 1 | 0.25% | 6 | 80 | Poor |
| IN | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 316 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 350 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 274 | Poor |
| AIME | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 341 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 252 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 359 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.