PRATHMIK VIDHALYA HASANPUR RAJAPUR R.NO. 2 PS 153
MANINDER PAL
BJBharatiya Janata Party176 votes at this polling station
over MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN (BS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 176 | 39.20% | |
| 2 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 154 | 34.30% | |
| 3 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 76 | 16.93% | |
| 4 | RAFAT | AIME | 24 | 5.35% | |
| 5 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 5 | 1.11% | |
| 6 | NASIM | IND | 4 | 0.89% | |
| 7 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 8 | SUBHASH | IND | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 9 | Nota | NOTA | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 11 | KULDEEP | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 449 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJ | 176 | 39.20% | 1 | 241 | Average |
| BS | 154 | 34.30% | 2 | 71 | Average |
| RLD | 76 | 16.93% | 3 | 327 | Weak |
| AIME | 24 | 5.35% | 4 | 33 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.34% | 5 | 31 | Poor |
| IN | 5 | 1.11% | 6 | 91 | Poor |
| AJP | 3 | 0.67% | 7 | 130 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.45% | 8 | 80 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.45% | 9 | 173 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 104 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 233 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 217 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.