PRATHMIK VIDHALYA NO.2 KHIWAI R. NO. 1 PS 139
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal775 votes at this polling station
over MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN (BS)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 775 | 91.93% | |
| 2 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 45 | 5.34% | |
| 3 | RAFAT | AIME | 11 | 1.30% | |
| 4 | Nota | NOTA | 6 | 0.71% | |
| 5 | NASIM | IND | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 6 | SUBHASH | IND | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 7 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 8 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 9 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 843 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 775 | 91.93% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| BS | 45 | 5.34% | 2 | 173 | Poor |
| AIME | 11 | 1.30% | 3 | 65 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 0.71% | 4 | 29 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.47% | 5 | 79 | Poor |
| IJ | 1 | 0.12% | 7 | 66 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.12% | 6 | 239 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 297 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 245 | Poor |
| IN | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 366 | Poor |
| BJ | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 393 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 208 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.