PRATHMIK VIDHALYA KHEDI KALAN PS 134
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal454 votes at this polling station
over RAFAT (AIME)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 454 | 59.04% | |
| 2 | RAFAT | AIME | 272 | 35.37% | |
| 3 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 24 | 3.12% | |
| 4 | Nota | NOTA | 9 | 1.17% | |
| 5 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 6 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | NASIM | IND | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 7 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 8 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 9 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 769 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 454 | 59.04% | 1 | 63 | Strong |
| AIME | 272 | 35.37% | 2 | 1 | Average |
| BS | 24 | 3.12% | 3 | 205 | Poor |
| NOTA | 9 | 1.17% | 4 | 6 | Poor |
| BJ | 6 | 0.78% | 5 | 382 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.26% | 6 | 178 | Poor |
| IJ | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 63 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.13% | 7 | 148 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 243 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 341 | Poor |
| IN | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 365 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 205 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.