PRATHMIK VIDHALYA HARRA R.NO. 2 PS 124
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal596 votes at this polling station
over RAFAT (AIME)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 596 | 85.14% | |
| 2 | RAFAT | AIME | 44 | 6.29% | |
| 3 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 34 | 4.86% | |
| 4 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 19 | 2.71% | |
| 5 | AMIT JANI | AJP | 5 | 0.71% | |
| 6 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 7 | SUBHASH | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | Nota | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | NASIM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 700 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 596 | 85.14% | 1 | 24 | Strong |
| AIME | 44 | 6.29% | 2 | 16 | Poor |
| BJ | 34 | 4.86% | 3 | 351 | Poor |
| BS | 19 | 2.71% | 4 | 224 | Poor |
| AJP | 5 | 0.71% | 5 | 80 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.14% | 6 | 258 | Poor |
| IN | 1 | 0.14% | 7 | 307 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 341 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 215 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 196 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 292 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 235 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.