UCCH PRATHMIK VIDHALYA (1 TO 8) PITHLOKAR ROOM N0 1 PS 1
GHULAM MOHAMMAD
RLDRashtriya Lok Dal472 votes at this polling station
over RAFAT (AIME)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GHULAM MOHAMMAD | RLD | 472 | 85.35% | |
| 2 | RAFAT | AIME | 54 | 9.76% | |
| 3 | MUKRRAM ALI URF NANHE KHATUN | BS | 13 | 2.35% | |
| 4 | Nota | NOTA | 5 | 0.90% | |
| 5 | JAGDISH PRASAD | IN | 4 | 0.72% | |
| 6 | MANINDER PAL | BJ | 3 | 0.54% | |
| 7 | NASIM | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | AMIT JANI | AIF | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | KULDEEP | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | JAGBIR SINGH | BJD | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | TEHZEEB | IJ | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | BHUPENDRA SINGH | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SUBHASH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 553 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD | 472 | 85.35% | 1 | 55 | Strong |
| AIME | 54 | 9.76% | 2 | 9 | Poor |
| BS | 13 | 2.35% | 3 | 254 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 0.90% | 4 | 36 | Poor |
| IN | 4 | 0.72% | 5 | 108 | Poor |
| BJ | 3 | 0.54% | 6 | 386 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 226 | Poor |
| AIF | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 1 | Poor |
| IJ | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 129 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 160 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 1 | Poor |
| BJD | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 99 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 43, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.