dEiksftV izk0 ik0 uckoiqjk etjk lksgjdk PS 55
MAHENDRA
COL 1818361 votes at this polling station
over MUKHYA GURJAR (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAHENDRA | COL 18 | 361 | 95.76% | |
| 2 | MUKHYA GURJAR | COL 21 | 9 | 2.39% | |
| 3 | VIKAR AHMAD | COL 42 | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 4 | SURAJ | COL 48 | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 5 | ANGOORI | COL 45 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 6 | PHIRERAM | COL 15 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 7 | OMKAR | COL 33 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 8 | KAMAL SINGH | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | ABDUL KHALIQ | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AASIM SABRI | COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ABRAR AHMAD | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AMAR SINGH | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AHTESHAM RZA HASHMI | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 377 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 361 | 94.50% | 1 | 159 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 9 | 2.36% | 2 | 397 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 2 | 0.52% | 3 | 117 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 2 | 0.52% | 4 | 192 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 1 | 0.26% | 7 | 313 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 1 | 0.26% | 5 | 355 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.26% | 6 | 58 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 194 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 282 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 361 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 348 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 240 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 283 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 42, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.