izk0Ldwy tgrkSyh eq0 d{k 1 PS 147
MUKHYA GURJAR
COL 2121637 votes at this polling station
over AHTESHAM RZA HASHMI (COL 30)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MUKHYA GURJAR | COL 21 | 637 | 94.93% | |
| 2 | AHTESHAM RZA HASHMI | COL 30 | 16 | 2.38% | |
| 3 | MAHENDRA | COL 18 | 12 | 1.79% | |
| 4 | ABRAR AHMAD | COL 24 | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 5 | ABDUL KHALIQ | COL 39 | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 6 | VIKAR AHMAD | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | ANGOORI | COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SURAJ | COL 48 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | AASIM SABRI | COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | PHIRERAM | COL 15 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | AMAR SINGH | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | OMKAR | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KAMAL SINGH | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 671 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 637 | 94.23% | 1 | 19 | Strong |
| COL 30 | 16 | 2.37% | 2 | 75 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 12 | 1.78% | 3 | 377 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 4 | 0.59% | 4 | 72 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 2 | 0.30% | 5 | 115 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 330 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 372 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 349 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 277 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 373 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 391 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 240 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 258 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 42, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.