Polling station 157 PS 157
Candidate Name 7-VIPUL DUBEY
NISHADNISHAD161 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 1- UPENDRA KUMAR SINGH (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 7-VIPUL DUBEY | NISHAD | 161 | 37.79% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 1- UPENDRA KUMAR SINGH | BSP | 112 | 26.29% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 2- RAM KISHORE BIND | SP | 95 | 22.30% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 6-VIJAY MISHRA | PMSP | 50 | 11.74% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 5-RAMDHANI | BMSP | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 3- SURESH CHANDRA MISHRA | INC | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 4- DHARMRAJ | SBP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 8-SWATANTR KUMAR | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 9-VIRENDRA TIRPATHI URF DABANG | NIRDAL | 1 | 0.23% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 426 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NISHAD | 161 | 37.62% | 1 | 202 | Average |
| BSP | 112 | 26.17% | 2 | 109 | Average |
| SP | 95 | 22.20% | 3 | 283 | Weak |
| PMSP | 50 | 11.68% | 4 | 293 | Weak |
| BMSP | 3 | 0.70% | 5 | 156 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.47% | 6 | 283 | Poor |
| NIRDAL | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 344 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 273 | Poor |
| SBP | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 225 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 393, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.