SANATAN DHARM INTER COLLAGE NAI SADAK R.NO.- 9 PS 99
DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI
BJPBharatiya Janata Party412 votes at this polling station
over KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI | BJP | 412 | 78.18% | |
| 2 | KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT | SP | 97 | 18.41% | |
| 3 | MUDITA KAPOOR | INC | 8 | 1.52% | |
| 4 | DINESH KASAUDHAN | BSP | 7 | 1.33% | |
| 5 | AJEET SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 6 | ARPAN PATHAK | LJPRV | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 7 | PARVEZ QUADIR KHAN | AIMEI | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SHIV PRASAD GUPTA | RRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SUBHASH CHANDRA CHAURASIYA | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | REYAZUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 527 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 412 | 78.03% | 1 | 93 | Strong |
| SP | 97 | 18.37% | 2 | 284 | Weak |
| INC | 8 | 1.52% | 3 | 91 | Poor |
| BSP | 7 | 1.33% | 4 | 56 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 1 | 0.19% | 6 | 131 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 5 | 190 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 32 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 196 | Poor |
| RRP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 156 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 154 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 191 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 389, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.