MADARSA MATALULOOM KAMALGARHA (SLATTER HOUSE) R PS 8
KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT
SPSamajwadi Party531 votes at this polling station
over DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT | SP | 531 | 73.65% | |
| 2 | DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI | BJP | 170 | 23.58% | |
| 3 | MUDITA KAPOOR | INC | 9 | 1.25% | |
| 4 | DINESH KASAUDHAN | BSP | 4 | 0.55% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ QUADIR KHAN | AIMEI | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 6 | AJEET SINGH | AAP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | SHIV PRASAD GUPTA | RRP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | SUBHASH CHANDRA CHAURASIYA | RBP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | REYAZUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ARPAN PATHAK | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 721 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 531 | 73.34% | 1 | 42 | Strong |
| BJP | 170 | 23.48% | 2 | 247 | Weak |
| INC | 9 | 1.24% | 3 | 67 | Poor |
| BSP | 4 | 0.55% | 4 | 99 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.41% | 5 | 66 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.28% | 6 | 109 | Poor |
| RBP | 1 | 0.14% | 7 | 66 | Poor |
| RRP | 1 | 0.14% | 8 | 33 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 86 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 77 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 126 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 389, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.