NEW JAIHIND PUBLIC SCHOOL KAMALGARHA R.NO.2 PS 6
KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT
SPSamajwadi Party631 votes at this polling station
over DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT | SP | 631 | 89.63% | |
| 2 | DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI | BJP | 55 | 7.81% | |
| 3 | MUDITA KAPOOR | INC | 9 | 1.28% | |
| 4 | PARVEZ QUADIR KHAN | AIMEI | 9 | 1.28% | |
| 5 | VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 6 | SHIV PRASAD GUPTA | RRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | SUBHASH CHANDRA CHAURASIYA | RBP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | REYAZUDDIN | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | AJEET SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ARPAN PATHAK | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DINESH KASAUDHAN | BSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 704 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 631 | 89.25% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| BJP | 55 | 7.78% | 2 | 290 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 9 | 1.27% | 3 | 6 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.27% | 4 | 66 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 75 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 147 | Poor |
| RRP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 89 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 301 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 245 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 85 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 124 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 389, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.