BASIC PRATHMIK PATHSHALA KAMALGARAHA R.NO.4 PS 4
KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT
SPSamajwadi Party589 votes at this polling station
over DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KAMESHWAR ALIAS KISHAN DIXIT | SP | 589 | 94.54% | |
| 2 | DR. NEELKANTH TIWARI | BJP | 16 | 2.57% | |
| 3 | DINESH KASAUDHAN | BSP | 6 | 0.96% | |
| 4 | MUDITA KAPOOR | INC | 5 | 0.80% | |
| 5 | PARVEZ QUADIR KHAN | AIMEI | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 6 | SHIV PRASAD GUPTA | RRP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 7 | REYAZUDDIN | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA | ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | AJEET SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ARPAN PATHAK | LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SUBHASH CHANDRA CHAURASIYA | RBP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 623 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 589 | 94.39% | 1 | 28 | Strong |
| BJP | 16 | 2.56% | 2 | 313 | Poor |
| BSP | 6 | 0.96% | 3 | 65 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.80% | 4 | 164 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.48% | 5 | 64 | Poor |
| RRP | 2 | 0.32% | 6 | 15 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 20 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 27 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 73 | Poor |
| RBP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 145 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 243 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 389, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.