izk0ik0 buk;riqj d0ua0&1 PS 218
SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA
BSPBSP132 votes at this polling station
over OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR (SBSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA | BSP | 132 | 44.59% | |
| 2 | OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR | SBSP | 110 | 37.16% | |
| 3 | KALICHARAN | BJP | 45 | 15.20% | |
| 4 | SHIVPUJAN | AAP | 3 | 1.01% | |
| 5 | JAI RAM | AIFB | 2 | 0.68% | |
| 6 | GYAN PRAKASH ALIAS " MUNNA" | INC | 2 | 0.68% | |
| 7 | RAMPRAVESH | MCPI | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | LALMOHAR | SRP | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | MAHESH SINGH CHAUHAN | RLJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ARVIND | BJNP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ARVIND VARMA | JDU | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SHAUKAT ALI | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SATYAA DEV SINGH | RJPLS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 296 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 132 | 44.44% | 1 | 167 | Strong |
| SBSP | 110 | 37.04% | 2 | 399 | Average |
| BJP | 45 | 15.15% | 3 | 385 | Weak |
| AAP | 3 | 1.01% | 4 | 41 | Poor |
| AIFB | 2 | 0.67% | 5 | 162 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.67% | 6 | 256 | Poor |
| MCPI | 1 | 0.34% | 7 | 163 | Poor |
| SRP | 1 | 0.34% | 8 | 142 | Poor |
| RJPLS | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 390 | Poor |
| RLJP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 348 | Poor |
| JDU | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 424 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 374 | Poor |
| BJNP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 343 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 377, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.