izk0ik0 dknhiqj iw0Nksj PS 210
OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR
SBSPSBSP290 votes at this polling station
over SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR | SBSP | 290 | 40.85% | |
| 2 | SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA | BSP | 207 | 29.15% | |
| 3 | KALICHARAN | BJP | 197 | 27.75% | |
| 4 | SATYAA DEV SINGH | RJPLS | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 5 | SHAUKAT ALI | AIMIM | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 6 | GYAN PRAKASH ALIAS " MUNNA" | INC | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 7 | ARVIND | BJNP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 8 | RAMPRAVESH | MCPI | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | JAI RAM | AIFB | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | ARVIND VARMA | JDU | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | SHIVPUJAN | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | MAHESH SINGH CHAUHAN | RLJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | LALMOHAR | SRP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 710 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBSP | 290 | 40.73% | 1 | 147 | Strong |
| BSP | 207 | 29.07% | 2 | 92 | Average |
| BJP | 197 | 27.67% | 3 | 128 | Average |
| RJPLS | 4 | 0.56% | 4 | 52 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.42% | 5 | 91 | Poor |
| BJNP | 2 | 0.28% | 6 | 54 | Poor |
| MCPI | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 63 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.28% | 7 | 252 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 350 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 222 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 279 | Poor |
| RLJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 343 | Poor |
| SRP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 324 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 377, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.