izk0ik0 cM+kxkao ¼uohu Hkou½ PS 173
SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA
BSPBSP427 votes at this polling station
over OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR (SBSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA | BSP | 427 | 53.04% | |
| 2 | OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR | SBSP | 212 | 26.34% | |
| 3 | KALICHARAN | BJP | 138 | 17.14% | |
| 4 | GYAN PRAKASH ALIAS " MUNNA" | INC | 9 | 1.12% | |
| 5 | SATYAA DEV SINGH | RJPLS | 8 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | MAHESH SINGH CHAUHAN | RLJP | 4 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | RAMPRAVESH | MCPI | 3 | 0.37% | |
| 8 | ARVIND VARMA | JDU | 3 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | JAI RAM | AIFB | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 10 | ARVIND | BJNP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | LALMOHAR | SRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SHIVPUJAN | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHAUKAT ALI | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 805 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 427 | 52.59% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| SBSP | 212 | 26.11% | 2 | 263 | Average |
| BJP | 138 | 17.00% | 3 | 227 | Weak |
| INC | 9 | 1.11% | 4 | 29 | Poor |
| RJPLS | 8 | 0.99% | 5 | 5 | Poor |
| RLJP | 4 | 0.49% | 6 | 16 | Poor |
| JDU | 3 | 0.37% | 7 | 163 | Poor |
| MCPI | 3 | 0.37% | 8 | 18 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.12% | 9 | 265 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 355 | Poor |
| BJNP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 321 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 341 | Poor |
| SRP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 300 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 377, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.