izk0ik0 txnh'kiqj d0ua0&1 PS 164
OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR
SBSPSBSP315 votes at this polling station
over SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OM PRAKASH RAJBHAR | SBSP | 315 | 65.35% | |
| 2 | SAIYYADA SHADAB FATIMA | BSP | 129 | 26.76% | |
| 3 | KALICHARAN | BJP | 35 | 7.26% | |
| 4 | ARVIND VARMA | JDU | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 5 | GYAN PRAKASH ALIAS " MUNNA" | INC | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 6 | JAI RAM | AIFB | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | MAHESH SINGH CHAUHAN | RLJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | RAMPRAVESH | MCPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | LALMOHAR | SRP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SHIVPUJAN | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SHAUKAT ALI | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SATYAA DEV SINGH | RJPLS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | ARVIND | BJNP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 482 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBSP | 315 | 64.81% | 1 | 122 | Strong |
| BSP | 129 | 26.54% | 2 | 172 | Average |
| BJP | 35 | 7.20% | 3 | 400 | Poor |
| AIFB | 1 | 0.21% | 4 | 263 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.21% | 5 | 328 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 340 | Poor |
| MCPI | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 312 | Poor |
| RJPLS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 377 | Poor |
| RLJP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 325 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 352 | Poor |
| BJNP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 314 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 337 | Poor |
| SRP | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 294 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 377, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.