P.S.BHULAIPUR PS 97

AC 370 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

DR R.K. PATEL

ADAD

217 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

63 16.3 pp

votes

over SUSHMA PATEL (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors649

Total turnout389votes cast at this station

Turnout %59.9% of this booth's roll

Male electors162

Female electors227

Vote share in this booth

of 386 votes counted

AD 56.2% SP 39.9% JDU 1.0% RSP 0.8% VIP 0.5% BRDP 0.5% IND 0.5% AAP 0.3% BSP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	DR R.K. PATEL	AD	217	56.22%
2	SUSHMA PATEL	SP	154	39.90%
3	SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL	JDU	4	1.04%
4	RAMDHARI PAL	RSP	3	0.78%
5	ASHOK KUMAR	VIP	2	0.52%
6	NIHARIKA GAUTAM	BRDP	2	0.52%
7	SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD	IND	2	0.52%
8	ACHCHEY LAL	AAP	1	0.26%
9	ANAND DUBEY	BSP	1	0.26%
10	MEERA PANDEY	INC	0	0.00%
11	ATUL DUBEY	BSSP	0	0.00%
12	SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA	LP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 386 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 370

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
AD	217	55.78%	1	156	Strong
SP	154	39.59%	2	224	Average
JDU	4	1.03%	3	43	Poor
RSP	3	0.77%	4	189	Poor
VIP	2	0.51%	7	104	Poor
IND	2	0.51%	6	121	Poor
BRDP	2	0.51%	5	260	Poor
BSP	1	0.26%	9	373	Poor
AAP	1	0.26%	8	255	Poor
LP	0	0.00%	12	282	Poor
BSSP	0	0.00%	10	291	Poor
INC	0	0.00%	11	358	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.