SAEVODAY I.C.SHUDANIPUR WEST SIDE PS 57
DR R.K. PATEL
ADAD191 votes at this polling station
over SUSHMA PATEL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 191 | 38.05% | |
| 2 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 131 | 26.10% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 130 | 25.90% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 16 | 3.19% | |
| 5 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 6 | 1.20% | |
| 6 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 6 | 1.20% | |
| 7 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 6 | 1.20% | |
| 8 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 5 | 1.00% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 4 | 0.80% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 11 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 12 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 2 | 0.40% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 502 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD | 191 | 37.90% | 1 | 207 | Average |
| SP | 131 | 25.99% | 2 | 258 | Average |
| BSP | 130 | 25.79% | 3 | 95 | Average |
| RSP | 16 | 3.17% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| BSSP | 6 | 1.19% | 5 | 19 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.19% | 6 | 50 | Poor |
| LP | 6 | 1.19% | 7 | 4 | Poor |
| BRDP | 5 | 0.99% | 8 | 95 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.79% | 9 | 34 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.60% | 10 | 65 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.40% | 12 | 111 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.40% | 11 | 169 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.