P.S UNCHANI KALA MIDDILE SIDE PS 42
ANAND DUBEY
BSPBSP209 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 209 | 42.74% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 137 | 28.02% | |
| 3 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 117 | 23.93% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 14 | 2.86% | |
| 5 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 6 | 1.23% | |
| 6 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 7 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 8 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 489 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 209 | 42.57% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| AD | 137 | 27.90% | 2 | 266 | Average |
| SP | 117 | 23.83% | 3 | 271 | Weak |
| RSP | 14 | 2.85% | 4 | 13 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.22% | 5 | 48 | Poor |
| BRDP | 3 | 0.61% | 6 | 195 | Poor |
| JDU | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 191 | Poor |
| LP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 130 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.20% | 7 | 243 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 281 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 308 | Poor |
| BSSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 267 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.