P.S MURKATIYA PS 379
ANAND DUBEY
BSPBSP236 votes at this polling station
over SUSHMA PATEL (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 236 | 37.40% | |
| 2 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 211 | 33.44% | |
| 3 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 164 | 25.99% | |
| 4 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 5 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 6 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 7 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 9 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 1 | 0.16% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 631 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 236 | 37.05% | 1 | 24 | Average |
| SP | 211 | 33.12% | 2 | 145 | Average |
| AD | 164 | 25.75% | 3 | 238 | Average |
| BRDP | 4 | 0.63% | 4 | 190 | Poor |
| JDU | 3 | 0.47% | 6 | 97 | Poor |
| BSSP | 3 | 0.47% | 5 | 77 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.47% | 7 | 83 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.31% | 8 | 295 | Poor |
| LP | 2 | 0.31% | 9 | 115 | Poor |
| RSP | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 341 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 297 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 307 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.