P.S.ADIYAR MIDDILE SIDE PS 378
SUSHMA PATEL
SPSP255 votes at this polling station
over DR R.K. PATEL (AD)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSHMA PATEL | SP | 255 | 43.81% | |
| 2 | DR R.K. PATEL | AD | 139 | 23.88% | |
| 3 | ANAND DUBEY | BSP | 107 | 18.38% | |
| 4 | RAMDHARI PAL | RSP | 51 | 8.76% | |
| 5 | SATESH KUMAR SHUKLA | LP | 6 | 1.03% | |
| 6 | NIHARIKA GAUTAM | BRDP | 6 | 1.03% | |
| 7 | SANTOSH KUMAR NISHAD | IND | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 8 | ACHCHEY LAL | AAP | 4 | 0.69% | |
| 9 | ATUL DUBEY | BSSP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 10 | ASHOK KUMAR | VIP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 11 | SUSHIL KUMAR PATEL | JDU | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 12 | MEERA PANDEY | INC | 2 | 0.34% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 582 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 255 | 43.44% | 1 | 100 | Strong |
| AD | 139 | 23.68% | 2 | 265 | Weak |
| BSP | 107 | 18.23% | 3 | 129 | Weak |
| RSP | 51 | 8.69% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| BRDP | 6 | 1.02% | 5 | 91 | Poor |
| LP | 6 | 1.02% | 6 | 6 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.68% | 7 | 89 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.68% | 8 | 58 | Poor |
| BSSP | 3 | 0.51% | 9 | 76 | Poor |
| VIP | 3 | 0.51% | 10 | 82 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.34% | 11 | 294 | Poor |
| JDU | 2 | 0.34% | 12 | 179 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 370, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.